Hmm, stuff about me. I'm 19, bi-, single, moderately eccentric... and that's just about it. In my spare time I like to make cute VFX videos, animations and all that generic hoo-haa. So be sure to check out my youtube channel at https://www.youtube.com/user/JordanDudeHolbrook and subscribe!!! Hugs!!!
twerkingwithsterek asked: I'm just curious, if a woman gets raped, does she also lose her right to her body?
I can see how people have misinterpreted what I was saying. What my point was that if this girl is 14 and she is sleeping with guys and not using contraceptive measures then she does not deserve the rights to her body, just as the guy has lost his rights to his body. And if a woman gets raped, then she still has the rights to her body, of course. The rapist has lost his/her rights, due to the fact that s/he is a rapist. Hope this helps clear things up.
No. You had sex with a girl when you were a child. It ended in pregnancy. You are attacking the morality of a 14 year old girl who terminated a pregnancy that would have resulted in a child that neither you or her had the capacity to care for. A girl that preserved your and her own youth, and stopped a child being raised in circumstances that are not fit for any child. You really should be assessing your own morality. What kind of 14 year old boy fucks a 14 year old girl, without protection, gets her pregnant and then runs an online smear campaign against her for doing what was best for her, her family and you? What? You think you had the capacity to raise a child at age 14/15? How would you feed it or look after it? You wouldn’t. You were going to dump it on her or your own parents, live like the carefree little shit you are and occasionally play with the child when you could be bothered and think “Wow, what a good, brave young father I am.” You made the mistake, she went through the trauma of saving your youth for you. You owe her so much better than this. You absolutely disgust me. Less than forward-slash three, you’re real fucking remorseful. That’s poetry that is. You’re breaking my heart kid. That girl should have every right to decide what she wants to do to her body. The idea that you should take responsibility and give birth implies that you are responsible to this fetus and you owe it something. A pregnant person does not owe a fetus anything any more than they owe you an apology for being alive. Try again, pro lifers. Pro-Choice.
I applaud this.
This is some sterling commentary.
This dumbass is also probably assuming the fetus was male. The sex is almost never known when an abortion takes place because it is early on into the pregnancy.
Going with this good ol’ fashioned love story, I’d like to point out: “Why must the fetus pay the price of the parents mistakes?”. I do not condone them having unprotected sex at 14, it is stupid. What were they expecting. But that’s all irrelevant in the eyes of the fetus. That child has no awareness of the fact that its parents are 14 years old but now it has lost the right to life because of its parents. And here the male is being blamed for not using a condom, yet [correct if I’m wrong] doesn’t it take two to tango? It’s not just the males fault, but also the female. She lost her right to her body when she let him inside her, so anything she says about how it is her body is utter b.s. If it is all about the body, what about the fetus’ body? Is the fetus now allowed rights? And if you wish to hit me with the argument that it’s not yet a person, that too is utter b.s. Here’s a curious yet interesting perspective to take [bear with me as I explain]: A common trend amongst serial killers is their justification for murder. Many of them claim that their victims were not yet human, they were empty. Similar to the viewpoint taken by pro-choicers. Both say that their ‘victims’ are not yet people. So how come these serial killers get sent down and not pro-choicers? What is it about birth that makes people so special? Is it at birth when a human becomes “Human”? It’s hard to tell. But the wheels are set in motion at conception. The baby has been made when the egg is fertilised. I told you its a curious method of looking at it, but think: “Both the serial killers and the pro-choicers put forward the same justification for why they killed”. Do you like this juxtaposition? With this entire argument I wish to yet again state that I am not on these children’s side, I am completely against what they did as it was stupid in every sense of the word. This is why we have an age of consent, et cetera. But that is no reason to kill the baby. In all seriousness, the baby should have been taken off them at birth. But that’s yet again another human being who has had the right to life stolen from them because some uptight women feel that their body is more precious than that of a baby. Nice move there. It shows real respect for other people, great empathy skills. Try again, pro-choicers. Pro-life.